Skip to content


Hard Closures for LAFD means 228 fewer firefighters on duty every day

4 comments

Another 106 firefighter positions removed from the streets in FY12

Kerry Cavanaugh of the Los Angeles Daily News previewed changes in Los Angeles Fire Department deployment that were to be announced today:

LAFD plan aiming to do more with less

Since 2008, the department's budget has shrunk by about $100 million and the LAFD hasn't hired a single firefighter.

In 2009, the fire department went on a "modified coverage plan," which closed fire companies on a rotating basis. Each day, 122 fewer fighters were assigned to stations.

The result was a chaotic system in which firefighters were shuttled all over town to work with people they didn't know – not a good situation for people who work in life-threatening conditions.

In LAFD there has been buzz about "hard closures" – permanent closing of companies – in the next budget year.

Cavanaugh explains the overall plan:

Fire Chief Millage Peaks' redeployment plan will permanently and selectively close fire companies based on the computer modeling data (from the last three years).

He'll reduce the number of staffed fire engines in areas where demand is low, and increase medical response in areas where demand is high.

Some 10 fire companies will be reassigned as paramedic resources – a reflection of the high number of medical calls.

The service closures will mean 106 fewer firefighters assigned to stations each day.

Instead, they'll fill in for firefighters who are sick, on vacation or in training, which will reduce overtime expenses.

By permanently cutting fire resources, the department will need 318 fewer firefighters.

(No one will be laid off, but position vacancies will not be filled.)

While NOT officially posted, it appears that 12 engines and six light forces (truck companies) will close. 

Some positiona will be used to restore rescue ambulances that were closed in 2009.  The article points out that 4 out of every 5 calls to LAFD are medical.

There is additional reorganization at the command level.

Anticipated to close:

  • Engines 1, 20, 35, 50, 69, 74, 73, 75, 92, 96, 105, and 209
  • Light Forces (trucks) 17, 28, 38, 47, 58 and 72.

Mike "FossilMedic" Ward

Also on FireGeezer…

  • ukfbbuff

    The reductions in Engine and Truck Companies with the accompanying re-inforcement of its EMS services will work only for a short duration. At a certain point the loss of the the closed comapnies will be felt with the accompanying losses in life and property.

    The lack of fortitude in fiscal management exhibited by Los Angeles City Hall will in the end come back to haunt them.

  • Brian Luce

    That’s a shame. I worked at a lot of the companies. What can you do though. The money ain’t there. It’s not the city’s fault. DC probably won’t bail us out, why should they? they know Calfiornia always goes blue.

  • firegeezer

    Why do you say it’s not the city’s fault? They have the money, but choose to spend it on other things, don’t they?

  • ukfbbuff

    FYI

    LA City FD.

    Example; Task Force 35 is:

    Engine 35, staffed with a Capt. I, Auto Fireman (Driver Operator) and two firefighters

    Truck 35 is staffed with a Capt. II (Task Force Commander) Appratus Operator (drives the truck)
    and three firefighters.

    Engine 235 is staffed with one Engineer (Driver/Operator) which is dedicated to Truck Water supply operations.

    Light Force 35; is just the Truck and Engine 235. 6 personnel.

    In dispatching, if Engine 35 is committed to a medical aid and a fire dispatch occurs,

    Light Force 35 and the next clostes engine (10) is dispatched along with another Task Force or combination to equal four engines and two trucks.

    Further, Computer Models of response activity can rapidly change due changes in population movement, weather, fire activity and other demographics.

    As I re-read this article I could not help but come up with the terms:

    “Adaptive Staffing” and “Strategic Relocation”

    Terms from the Textbook: “Fire Department Deployment Analysis” The RAND Fire Project.

    Which on its face looks impressive, but as written about in his book:

    “The Fires” author Joe Flood

    seemed to expose some of the fallicies of what is written in the RAND text.