Skip to content


Idiot Replacement Theory

10 comments

We were about 2/3rds through our career when Eddie described his Idiot Replacement Theory (IRT). For every old-school idiot, jerk or loser who retired, our generation would provide an equally inept replacement. I was shocked when he originally made that statement and wondered if it still was true.

CONFEDERACY OF DUNCES

We were part of the hundreds hired thirty years ago as a collection of rural VFDs grew into an urban county fire department. Our first line supervisors were appointed years before affirmative action. The promotion process was a “store-bought” 100 question multiple choice exam. Candidates who scored as low as 47/100 were promoted.

I worked for one of these old-school lieutenants at an engine-tiller truck-ambulance house. He was a hometown volunteer who applied for a county job when his construction trades company failed in the middle of a building boom. He could barely read or write. He had no supervisory skills and a wicked temper. He refused to allow his firefighters to get turned over as back-up drivers.

Just one firefighter was a back-up engine driver, three firefighters were tiller-qualified. All obtained training before they were assigned to this station. The truck sergeant was the back-up tractor driver if both of the apparatus technicians were off.

ARROGANCE OF YOUTH

As 20-something baby boomers, we believed that we were smarter, better and more capable than the 40, 50 and 60 year old chiefs, captains and senior firefighters.  Just ask us.

We had more formal education. We had folders bulging with NFPA/ProBoard and state EMS certifications. We competed for promotions by taking validated, diversity-appropriate promotional exams that had a written and performance component.  In order to qualify for the exam, we had to meet time-in-grade and career development requirements. The difference from the #1 spot to the #15 spot in promotional eligible list was less than 2.4127 points.

As 40-somethings we promoted into the middle management ranks: staff jobs, specialty section supervisors and field battalion chiefs.  That was when Eddie, working at a staff job, described the idiot replacement theory.

BEST AND BRIGHTEST

It has been about 15 years since Eddie expressed his theory.  Our group now makes up most of the senior department leadership. Impressive resumes, some with graduate degrees, and many completing the NFA Executive Fire Officer program (HERE). A few are credentialed as a Chief Fire Officer (HERE). About 40% of the senior staff were/are paramedics.

The issues are different. The disconnect, dysfunction and anger expressed by those hired in the past six years sound frustratingly familiar.

REORGANIZING DURING WORST BUDGET SINCE WORLD WAR II

The department is implementing a long-overdue merging of the company officer ranks and reconfiguring the staffing of ambulances. In a department known for making very complex solutions, these are related … along with career development.

When I talk to the paramedic/firefighters from my era that are still on the job, they feel betrayed by the department. Their investment in EMS seems unappreciated and minimized. Moving lieutenant positions from medic ambulances to ladder companies is a kick in the teeth. Yet another example that ems is second-class. The most articulate advocate for this perspective set up a listserv to support his position.

When I talk to firemedics that came on in the past six years, they complain about a lengthy intern process that is designed to crush initiative and competency. Not much love when a national registry paramedic with years of pre-employment experience in a 1-and-1 or chase car system is berated by a senior ems supervisor with a cardiac-emt card and a much smaller ALS skill set.

The  firemedics point out that the department has made two or three changes in “career development” that keeps piling on the time they need need to spend on the street before they can take the “all-hazards” lieutenant exam. They set up a blog site that, through anonymous postings, are brutal in their assessment of senior staff.

Especially after promoting 31 lieutenants from an “all-hazards” promotional test that the firemedics could not take AFTER a change in the time-in-grade requirements. I guess the effort to recruit experienced national registry paramedics does not count towards their “qualification” to become lieutenants. Only the time spent on local streets will count.

HEY EDDIE …

There seems to be the same percentage of “idiots” in senior positions today as there were 30 years ago. Better credentialed, better educated, more effective communicators but still maintaining that disconnect and dysfunction that made us angry decades ago.

Henry Mintzberg is the John Cleghorn Professor of Management Studies at McGill University in Montreal.  I have read a couple of his books.  In the July-August 2009 edition of Harvard Business Review, Mintzberg explains a crisis worse than the economy, the “deprecation in companies of communities – people’s sense of belonging to and caring for something larger than themselves.”

In the next Urban Commander article, we will look at how YOU can improve this situation.  It will NOT require a ”Beer Summit.”  Link to Rebuilding Companies as Communities

Mike “FossilMedic” Ward
Urban Commander Series

Also on FireGeezer…

  • Joe Swift

    Nice editorial Mike, Current and right on. Just a fine example of history repeting itself.

    Joe Swift

  • Joe Swift

    Nice editorial Mike, Current and right on. Just a fine example of history repeting itself.

    Joe Swift

  • http://firegeezer.com/ FossilMedic

    Thanks Joe,

    Also thanks to Brad for catching a typo (!!) I think the fossil needs stronger glasses :)

  • http://firegeezer.com FossilMedic

    Thanks Joe,

    Also thanks to Brad for catching a typo (!!) I think the fossil needs stronger glasses :)

  • Dal90

    It is one thing I’m curious to see…

    We know there’s lots of resistance to change, history repeating, etc (the whole “200 years of tradition unimpeded by progress…).

    But we also know progress does occur. A lot of progress, even if some areas are just catching up to 1988. (Seriously, sending an engine with the paperwork to HQ everday? Hello, fax machines?)

    We also know some problems are more noticeable today. Firefighter arson, for example. I don’t think for a moment firefighter arson is more prevalent today then 20, 40 years ago. It is likely it occurs less.

    But we know about it a lot more. Same thing with LODDs — what used to be a small “In memory of” listing in Firehouse magazine three months after the fact is now a new post in Firehouse.com thirty minutes into the incident.

    While maybe on 10% of firefighters are online regularly, does the internet provide a way for collective wisdom that used to sink in only with experience — like the Internet Replacement Theory — get spread sooner and wider to the young bucks so they learn faster from the past generation’s mistakes?

  • Dal90

    It is one thing I’m curious to see…

    We know there’s lots of resistance to change, history repeating, etc (the whole “200 years of tradition unimpeded by progress…).

    But we also know progress does occur. A lot of progress, even if some areas are just catching up to 1988. (Seriously, sending an engine with the paperwork to HQ everday? Hello, fax machines?)

    We also know some problems are more noticeable today. Firefighter arson, for example. I don’t think for a moment firefighter arson is more prevalent today then 20, 40 years ago. It is likely it occurs less.

    But we know about it a lot more. Same thing with LODDs — what used to be a small “In memory of” listing in Firehouse magazine three months after the fact is now a new post in Firehouse.com thirty minutes into the incident.

    While maybe on 10% of firefighters are online regularly, does the internet provide a way for collective wisdom that used to sink in only with experience — like the Internet Replacement Theory — get spread sooner and wider to the young bucks so they learn faster from the past generation’s mistakes?

  • Mike Love

    Of course the other end of the spectrum has every generation of senior firefighter/officer complain about the lack dedication, motivation, interest, bravery, etc. of every new batch. Every generation criticizes the older idiots then reflects on the new losers. Its a tradition and I’ll bet its been going on since they pulled hose wagons to the fire.

  • Mike Love

    Of course the other end of the spectrum has every generation of senior firefighter/officer complain about the lack dedication, motivation, interest, bravery, etc. of every new batch. Every generation criticizes the older idiots then reflects on the new losers. Its a tradition and I’ll bet its been going on since they pulled hose wagons to the fire.

  • Bob Ridgeway

    Mike;
    Excellent editorial on the historical perspective of fire service management, i.e. ‘the more things change, the more they remain the same’. From my perspective (40 + years in the business), we have always had some excellent and forward-thinking officers in the profession, regadless of their educational level. Conversely, we have always had some real losers: a few idiots, some hard-headed and/or close-minded folks, and even some who were just plain friggin’ stupid. But for the most part, the officers that I have been associated with over my career have been good, compasionate, and caring people who genuinely wanted to do a good job, and who cared about their people. Let’s hope it remains that way in the future.
    - Bob R.

  • Bob Ridgeway

    Mike;
    Excellent editorial on the historical perspective of fire service management, i.e. ‘the more things change, the more they remain the same’. From my perspective (40 + years in the business), we have always had some excellent and forward-thinking officers in the profession, regadless of their educational level. Conversely, we have always had some real losers: a few idiots, some hard-headed and/or close-minded folks, and even some who were just plain friggin’ stupid. But for the most part, the officers that I have been associated with over my career have been good, compasionate, and caring people who genuinely wanted to do a good job, and who cared about their people. Let’s hope it remains that way in the future.
    - Bob R.