Somebody on TV yesterday went to all the trouble to point out that shortly after noon today the clock/calendar display will read 12:34:56 - 7/8/09. It probably took you all of 1/10th of a second to spot the transposition of the last two digits (09) that messes up the whole game. Maybe that particular talking head can only handle up to eight digits effectively. But it was a nice try.
The pure time/date sequence took place in 1990, but nobody forewarned us then, that I can remember. But we didn’t have the wonderful world-wide-web back then to spread useless information around the universe at the speed of light. The next time that the perfect digital scenario is scheduled to appear will be 81 years from now. If any of you are still around then, be sure to remind us, ok?
* * * * *
There has been a bit of buzz during the last couple of weeks about the deliberately-slanted study done by The Heritage Foundation that “indicates” the fire service SAFER grants, etc., do not accomplish any good and should be abolished.
Chief Billy Goldfeder at Firefighter Close Calls has just published an excellent rebuttal written by a Massachusetts firefighter. The essay is properly researched and footnoted and is an ideal reference for anybody who wants to respond to the Heritage Foundation’s claims. An example:
One adaptation that the NAPA specifically supports in its report is the strengthening of the nation’s EMS system. More and more fire departments are taking on ambulance service delivery, and there are some gaps in the quality of care from community to community. According to the report, EMS response is one of three main areas that the AFG program can potentially impact [3]. The NAPA report also notes that the program can work, “with others to support strengthened EMS capabilities and effectiveness” [4].
As first responders, firefighters and EMTs are the frontline for disasters and emergencies. We are an important part of national preparedness at all levels. The NAPA report does not lose sight of this, and recognizes that the AFG program satisfies several of the necessary capabilities of the National Response Plan. These capabilities include, but are not limited to: firefighting operations/support; triage and prehospital treatment; and WMD/hazardous materials response [5]. In other words, building local capacity, which the AFG does, will increase national safety on the whole. The Foundation should stand behind this, as they, “want an America that is safe and secure” [6].
While The Heritage Foundation is dedicated to making government more efficient and smaller, their reasons for eliminating an entire funding process are shallow underneath the conclusions that they propose for the SAFER program.
Make sure that you read, and save, the entire essay that FFCloseCalls has posted HERE.
Update: Be sure to read the rebuttal to the rebuttal in our Comment #1 below.
After you’ve done that, let’s get this equipment checked out. I need to get the coffee started.

Visit us at booth #2200 in the Exhibit Hall
Recent Comments