Skip to content


Morning Lineup – April 10

8 comments

We have talked a couple of times before about the absolute need to run a background check on somebody before you hire them (or vote them in if yours is a volunteer squad).  The story yesterday (HERE) about John Berken,the paid-on-call firefighter in Forest Lake, Minnesota, is a classic case of why you absolutely need to do that.

Let’s take a look at his background:

  •   In 1991, he was sentenced to a year in prison for threatening to bomb the Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie. He used a radio in his car and spoke with an accent, saying, “This is Achmed Ismail. I am going to blow up your airport.”
  • On another occasion, he called air traffic controllers and said the pilot of his aircraft had suffered a heart attack and that he needed help landing the plane.
  • In the early 1990′s he was convicted of several theft charges in three different counties.
  • In 1993 he was convicted in still another county for felony check forgery.
  • When he was operating his Ford automobile dealership, he would sometimes try to intimidate his competitors by posing as a police officer.  Employees of area car dealerships told authorities that Berken drove a squad car to their lots, Anoka County Sheriff’s Lt. Paul Sommer said Wednesday. Berken, wearing a SWAT team uniform and carrying a nightstick, marched up and down the aisles of dealerships, Sommer said.
  • Altogether he had spent a total of 20 months in prison for his offenses before he applied to become a firefighter.

This is more than just criminal behavior.  Much of it can be classed as bizarre behavior and certainly indicates an unpredictable person.  When he filled out his fire department application in 2005, there was a question that asked if he had ever been convicted of any felonies within the past five years and he truthfully answered “No.”  All of his convictions were closer to ten years previously.

So he was hired on provisionally while they eventually ran the background check on him.  When the report came back, the city administrator and the fire chief moved to dismiss him immediately.  So how did this weirdo get back on the department?  After he was fired Berken appealed directly to the then-mayor Terry Smith who overrode the chief’s decision and ordered Berken to be re-instated.

“I felt it was discriminating to bar employment to an individual based on the information given within the parameters of the city application,” Smith told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. “John Berken was an exemplary citizen, a director on our Chamber of Commerce.  “He’d been in trouble for check forgery. But if a person pays his dues and turns his life around, I don’t see a concern there.”

So there you have it.  The fire chief and the city administrator doing their jobs and a politician abandoning reasoned decisions to take care of a friend.  The mayor’s faulty thinking rests on the fact that he doesn’t know the difference between “paying his dues” and how it displays the man’s character.  It was there all the time and this event never had to happen.

Now let’s show some character and get this equipment checked out.  I’m late getting the coffee started.

  • B.Morgan

    Serious stuff. At least they caught him. I have run into several like cases over the years. Checking for a felony should go back more then 5 years, more like forever. If in fact if a person is considered with a criminal back ground lots of additional check and research need to be done by the hiring agency.
    A cousin of mine was convicted of a felony over 30 years ago and she went very stright after the convictions and had been a model citizen since. Would I hire her, perhaps if she could prove a flawless record since her conviction. Probably not since it was a serious felony with drugs and guns.
    Some things we just have to live with forever.

    A small Federal Agency has aquired a record of hiring some former criminals, nut cases and incompetents into police/fire positions over the years as a result of poor back ground checks and no psychological testing.

    The background and history checks need to continue after being hired. Sometimes good people go bad.

  • B.Morgan

    Serious stuff. At least they caught him. I have run into several like cases over the years. Checking for a felony should go back more then 5 years, more like forever. If in fact if a person is considered with a criminal back ground lots of additional check and research need to be done by the hiring agency.
    A cousin of mine was convicted of a felony over 30 years ago and she went very stright after the convictions and had been a model citizen since. Would I hire her, perhaps if she could prove a flawless record since her conviction. Probably not since it was a serious felony with drugs and guns.
    Some things we just have to live with forever.

    A small Federal Agency has aquired a record of hiring some former criminals, nut cases and incompetents into police/fire positions over the years as a result of poor back ground checks and no psychological testing.

    The background and history checks need to continue after being hired. Sometimes good people go bad.

  • Jon

    The plot thickens..

  • Jon

    The plot thickens..

  • Dal90

    Geezer dug up even more charges then I did yesterday, granted I didn’t look hard :)

    I don’t believe a felony conviction alone should be a bar to future public service.

    HOWEVER, that’s far from being a get out of jail card. And I don’t believe our current justice system is set up to support all the steps I think would be necessary.

    First, the incident needs to be an isolated situation and not a pattern. If you get sent BACK to jail, that’s an automatic permanent fail.

    Second, you need to have completed any probationary period succesfully. And I don’t believe we have long enough probation / parole usually, and I believe we spend to little on probation / parole officers.

    Third, you need to have probation / parole officers who have the power to make recommendations. They should be able to say if they feel a person is capable or not of holding a position of public trust again.

    Fourth, if for no other candidates, then at least for people who’ve met the first three criteria and seek a waiver of a no felons policy then you have a pyschological exam.

    I’d much rather have a society where we have a way to forgive but not forget felons, rather then what we often do today with juveniles and first time offenders where they have their records sealed.

  • Dal90

    Geezer dug up even more charges then I did yesterday, granted I didn’t look hard :)

    I don’t believe a felony conviction alone should be a bar to future public service.

    HOWEVER, that’s far from being a get out of jail card. And I don’t believe our current justice system is set up to support all the steps I think would be necessary.

    First, the incident needs to be an isolated situation and not a pattern. If you get sent BACK to jail, that’s an automatic permanent fail.

    Second, you need to have completed any probationary period succesfully. And I don’t believe we have long enough probation / parole usually, and I believe we spend to little on probation / parole officers.

    Third, you need to have probation / parole officers who have the power to make recommendations. They should be able to say if they feel a person is capable or not of holding a position of public trust again.

    Fourth, if for no other candidates, then at least for people who’ve met the first three criteria and seek a waiver of a no felons policy then you have a pyschological exam.

    I’d much rather have a society where we have a way to forgive but not forget felons, rather then what we often do today with juveniles and first time offenders where they have their records sealed.

  • North chief

    sounds like we should review our applications and ask have you ever been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony, EVER. Let the hiring supervisor make the decesion based on all the facts. The sad thing is sometimes we use the same application they use to hire a trash man or parks worker. we have to remeber we are the only government officials in the US who can walk into your house without a warrant. There is an extreme responsibility on us to keep people like this out of our job.

  • North chief

    sounds like we should review our applications and ask have you ever been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony, EVER. Let the hiring supervisor make the decesion based on all the facts. The sad thing is sometimes we use the same application they use to hire a trash man or parks worker. we have to remeber we are the only government officials in the US who can walk into your house without a warrant. There is an extreme responsibility on us to keep people like this out of our job.