Skip to content


Emergency Twitters

10 comments

This is the first in a series of occasional articles about how some fire and rescue departments are using Twitter to enhance their operations.

IN EARLY SEPTEMBER OF LAST YEAR THE ENTIRE AREA AROUND GALVESTON BAY, TEXAS, was girding up for what was looking like a certain hit from Hurricane Ike that was heading their way.

Tracking models showed that it was likely to make landfall at Baytown, just east of Houston.  Baytown has a population of about 68,000 and is served by a fire department housed in five stations.

baytown-patch

As Ike was identified as a possible risk, the city began making preparations for the storm.  The area is prone to periodic direct hits from hurricanes and they have tested procedures already in place.  The Baytown Fire Dept. assigned Lt. Patrick Mahoney of the Training and Safety Office to be their communications liasion during the storm.

Lt. Mahoney was recently getting familiar with Twitter and put his imagination to work as he set up the departmental communications contingency plans.  Knowing that there will be a lengthy period where there will be no utilities service after the storm wall hits, he devised an alternative procedure to communicate between stations when all the phones and electricity are down.

Banking on the probability that there will be at least one (and probably several)  FF’s in each station who have an iPhone or Blackberry-type PDA with them, he set up a Twitter account for each station plus one for Administration.  The pages were set up to be blocked to everybody except the BFD personnel.*

He was also taking advantage of the fact that cellphone towers have their own emergency backup generators, and  if they weren’t blown over (unlikely since they were built with hurricane winds in mind), then they would always have access to the internet.

During the course of the storm  each station was entering vital information about what was going on in their areas.  Lt. Mahoney describes it as “situational awareness” reporting where they would post updates on which structures were gone or any problems that affected fire operations and responses.  As the eye was over them, they could get out for a quick reconnaissance and update each other through their Twitter pages.

baytown-twitter-page

This method was used continually until the electric service was restored.  His description of the performance of the Tweeting was “durable.”  As long as they could get on the internet, they were in business.

As a side note, when the FD went into storm operations, the three shifts were combined into two shifts, one on and one off, and the City turned a middle school into an employees’ shelter where all off-duty fire, police and other city services were housed during the operation.  Their families were all evacuated from the area.

We believe that this is one of the earliest uses of Twitter by an emergency service agency.  By passing this information along, we hope that others can take the germ of the idea and adapt it to your own situations.

*  Twitter pages can be blocked from public viewing by going to the Settings page and checking the “Protect my updates” box.

Baytown Fire Department WEBSITE.

baytown-station-2

  • Dal90

    This is part of a bigger trend in changes.

    1) Texting
    During the Ice Storm in December, 2008 the major AM station for Worcester, WTAG, lost it’s ground phone lines.

    They suspended normal programming and served as a clearinghouse for information. Working off of a single cellphone on Friday and Saturday, they asked people if at all possible to text message their questions in. Occassionally they’d have a government official call in and they would literally hold the cellphone to the microphone (you can imagine the low quality, but it got the messages out).

    Even as they started restoring service the following Thursday a week after the storm hit they were encouraging text messaging as the most efficient way to get their questions asked over the air.

    I thought that was a tremendous use of technology.

    If you look at situations like the response to Katrina, it’s clear our major weakness is the lack of a national resource management system — humans involved in Emergency Management agencies nationwide were overwhelmed by the volume of personal communications. Instant Messaging would’ve been an improvement, particularly if tied into a true Resource Management System to match the closest appropriate resource with requests coming in.

    2) Hosted applications
    At work we already have our email hosted by Google, and we use Google Apps heavily to share documents and spreadsheets.

    Beyond just applications, it’s now possible to host your own servers in “clouds.” Again at the company I work most of the time for we’re already using some services from Amazon’s Advanced Web Services division. By this summer I hope to migrate everything to virtual servers hosted in the Amazon network — we’ll eliminate our physical servers and save about 1/3rd per month on our costs with greater availability and reliability.

    When you combine the ability to host documents, simple applications, and even your own servers for costs that often can be hidden in an operating expense budget…along with broadband wireless devices like the Blackberries and Smartphones especially with the improvements over the next few years a 3G and WiMax networks come on line…we’re back to a situation like the 1990s when computing power moved out of corporate “glass houses” and into departmental servers.

    In the corporate world those departmental servers have slowly all moved back inside fancy data centers. This new trend will be tougher to reign in, as the company’s only connection is the monthly bill — there aren’t servers sitting in closets to seize control of, or wires in the office to control, or even firewall settings controlled by IT. People can setup the hosted solutions and access them by broadband phones or their own laptops with a broadband card without ever physically touching they company’s own infrastructure.

    With the new technology, undoubtedly aggresive managers will simply bypass IT alltogether if they don’t get the answer they want to hear and just start hosting information outside the company rather then jump through IT hoops (just as they did buying the first Novell and Microsoft servers years ago when the mainframe folks weren’t responsive).

    People using Twitter reminds me of the confluence of these two — increased reliance on text over voice, and increased hosting on low cost, reliable systems external to the organization.

    These moments in time tend to be ones of great innovation until the new technolgoy matures to the point they get constrained by new policies and procedures.

  • Dal90

    This is part of a bigger trend in changes.

    1) Texting
    During the Ice Storm in December, 2008 the major AM station for Worcester, WTAG, lost it’s ground phone lines.

    They suspended normal programming and served as a clearinghouse for information. Working off of a single cellphone on Friday and Saturday, they asked people if at all possible to text message their questions in. Occassionally they’d have a government official call in and they would literally hold the cellphone to the microphone (you can imagine the low quality, but it got the messages out).

    Even as they started restoring service the following Thursday a week after the storm hit they were encouraging text messaging as the most efficient way to get their questions asked over the air.

    I thought that was a tremendous use of technology.

    If you look at situations like the response to Katrina, it’s clear our major weakness is the lack of a national resource management system — humans involved in Emergency Management agencies nationwide were overwhelmed by the volume of personal communications. Instant Messaging would’ve been an improvement, particularly if tied into a true Resource Management System to match the closest appropriate resource with requests coming in.

    2) Hosted applications
    At work we already have our email hosted by Google, and we use Google Apps heavily to share documents and spreadsheets.

    Beyond just applications, it’s now possible to host your own servers in “clouds.” Again at the company I work most of the time for we’re already using some services from Amazon’s Advanced Web Services division. By this summer I hope to migrate everything to virtual servers hosted in the Amazon network — we’ll eliminate our physical servers and save about 1/3rd per month on our costs with greater availability and reliability.

    When you combine the ability to host documents, simple applications, and even your own servers for costs that often can be hidden in an operating expense budget…along with broadband wireless devices like the Blackberries and Smartphones especially with the improvements over the next few years a 3G and WiMax networks come on line…we’re back to a situation like the 1990s when computing power moved out of corporate “glass houses” and into departmental servers.

    In the corporate world those departmental servers have slowly all moved back inside fancy data centers. This new trend will be tougher to reign in, as the company’s only connection is the monthly bill — there aren’t servers sitting in closets to seize control of, or wires in the office to control, or even firewall settings controlled by IT. People can setup the hosted solutions and access them by broadband phones or their own laptops with a broadband card without ever physically touching they company’s own infrastructure.

    With the new technology, undoubtedly aggresive managers will simply bypass IT alltogether if they don’t get the answer they want to hear and just start hosting information outside the company rather then jump through IT hoops (just as they did buying the first Novell and Microsoft servers years ago when the mainframe folks weren’t responsive).

    People using Twitter reminds me of the confluence of these two — increased reliance on text over voice, and increased hosting on low cost, reliable systems external to the organization.

    These moments in time tend to be ones of great innovation until the new technolgoy matures to the point they get constrained by new policies and procedures.

  • http://www.firehousezen.com/ Mick Mayers

    I have been “tweeting” for a little while and I am intrigued by the possibilities. This is an excellent example of innovation and quick thinking. Good stuff!

  • http://www.firehousezen.com Mick Mayers

    I have been “tweeting” for a little while and I am intrigued by the possibilities. This is an excellent example of innovation and quick thinking. Good stuff!

  • B Morgan

    It’s good to have new technology to use like Twitters to get out needed information, pictures and text at your finger tips. In an emergency it gives HQ a real picture of the situation and a improved ability to make good decisions.

    I use an aircard on my lap top, granted bigger and more bulk then a cell phone but it works the same with better quality and more capability then a cell phone. I’m on the road a good deal and anywhere there is a cell signal I’m ready to work. Hook this up to a good quality camera or host of other things and instant information. Every station, if not every vehicle should have this technology. Launch the mini unmanned recon aircraft over the incident and have it beam down pictures to view on the laptop.

    Now if only our common sense can keep up with the aviliable technology.

  • http://firegeezer B Morgan

    It’s good to have new technology to use like Twitters to get out needed information, pictures and text at your finger tips. In an emergency it gives HQ a real picture of the situation and a improved ability to make good decisions.

    I use an aircard on my lap top, granted bigger and more bulk then a cell phone but it works the same with better quality and more capability then a cell phone. I’m on the road a good deal and anywhere there is a cell signal I’m ready to work. Hook this up to a good quality camera or host of other things and instant information. Every station, if not every vehicle should have this technology. Launch the mini unmanned recon aircraft over the incident and have it beam down pictures to view on the laptop.

    Now if only our common sense can keep up with the aviliable technology.

  • Dal90

    Reading Morgan’s post:

    1) Having dash cams that dispatch, or responding Chiefs, can view real time isn’t that far off. The pieces parts are there already, and hopefully if the coming 700mhz public safety network is done right 3G broadband will be built into it.

    2) You are going to see more UAVs in public safety.

    I’ve never run the numbers, but it has to be cheaper to fly a UAV then a helicopter.

    I wouldn’t doubt in a state like Connecticut you could keep 4,5,6,8 something like that up in the air on “auto pilot” with only a couple pilots and couple observers back at State Police HQ. When an incident requiring observation occurs they simply take control of the nearest UAV already on station.

    While I’m sure our one helicopter has done the occassional VIP flight or such, the only non-observational use I’ve ever heard of it being used for is water drops on brush fires. UAVs would accomplish 99% of it’s missions for either less cost or a better quality (faster) service.

    There’s also no reason you couldn’t regionally pool resources — so all police UAVs in New England were operated out of a single control center.

  • Dal90

    Reading Morgan’s post:

    1) Having dash cams that dispatch, or responding Chiefs, can view real time isn’t that far off. The pieces parts are there already, and hopefully if the coming 700mhz public safety network is done right 3G broadband will be built into it.

    2) You are going to see more UAVs in public safety.

    I’ve never run the numbers, but it has to be cheaper to fly a UAV then a helicopter.

    I wouldn’t doubt in a state like Connecticut you could keep 4,5,6,8 something like that up in the air on “auto pilot” with only a couple pilots and couple observers back at State Police HQ. When an incident requiring observation occurs they simply take control of the nearest UAV already on station.

    While I’m sure our one helicopter has done the occassional VIP flight or such, the only non-observational use I’ve ever heard of it being used for is water drops on brush fires. UAVs would accomplish 99% of it’s missions for either less cost or a better quality (faster) service.

    There’s also no reason you couldn’t regionally pool resources — so all police UAVs in New England were operated out of a single control center.

  • j2brown

    RE: UAVs

    I used to work for a company that did a lot of small UAV work. Somewhere around 7-9 years ago we were attempting to market UAVs to law enforcement agencies. The biggest hurdle at that time was insurance/liability. “What if it falls out of the sky?” etc. I’m sure times have changed, and I still agree that UAVs would be a great tool for all kinds of public safety/disaster relief efforts. We marketed them as traditional surveillance tools to LE, and considered applications in wild land firefighting and also use as communication nodes/relays as well.

  • j2brown

    RE: UAVs

    I used to work for a company that did a lot of small UAV work. Somewhere around 7-9 years ago we were attempting to market UAVs to law enforcement agencies. The biggest hurdle at that time was insurance/liability. “What if it falls out of the sky?” etc. I’m sure times have changed, and I still agree that UAVs would be a great tool for all kinds of public safety/disaster relief efforts. We marketed them as traditional surveillance tools to LE, and considered applications in wild land firefighting and also use as communication nodes/relays as well.