Skip to content


Another NHS Scheme To Not Send Ambulances

4 comments

UK’s NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, which seems to constantly put new desks in service while taking ambulances out of service, has offered up still another scheme to cover up their failure to get ambulances to their patients.  The new proposal calls for not sending the ambulances in the first place.

This plan will be introduced into the South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust in Buckinghamshire.  It calls for greater use of “rapid response cars” and a legion of volunteers and trained observers.  There are three levels of service proposed:

  • Urban areas – They will send a rapid response car (one medic, no transport ability) to assess the patient and then the medic will decide if an ambulance is needed.
  • Semi-urban areas – “Aternative healthcare professionals” and volunteers will somehow dash to the incident where they will assess the patient and make the decision if an ambulance is required.
  • Rural areas – “First responders” including volunteers, fire crews and police officers will go to the patient and make the same determination.  If they call for an ambulance, then the target response time will be 19 minutes.

Even though it said workers would follow “robust clinical rules” the ambulance trust admits that the new set-up could make matters worse.  So far, nobody in Buckinghamshire seems very enthusiastic about the proposal.  The chairman of Buckinghamshire County Council’s overview and scrutiny committee for public health services, said, “It is not something I would be particularly comfortable with, but it seems they are just lobbing ideas in the air.” 

The Bucks Free Press has the latest REPORT.

  • B. Morgan

    Common Sense has not caught up with aviliable technology. Who is going to volunteer late at night on a holiday???

  • B. Morgan

    Common Sense has not caught up with aviliable technology. Who is going to volunteer late at night on a holiday???

  • Glenn Gaines

    Haven’t these people heard of call triaging? If used, they would not have to drive to the scene to determine what they already know from talking with the person who called. If the patient is too incoherent to answer the canned questions….. send an ambulance!

    If they are already doing call triage, then this proposal is redundant and idiotic.

    19 minutes? You can get a cab or pizza faster. What about a trauma incident? Going to send a police officer out to check on the internal bleeder to see if they really need to go to the hospital?

    Oh, never mind. Saves money. Increases effeciency.

    Drives up pain and suffering, but, a small price to pay. Especially when you are not the one in pain or suffering.

  • Glenn Gaines

    Haven’t these people heard of call triaging? If used, they would not have to drive to the scene to determine what they already know from talking with the person who called. If the patient is too incoherent to answer the canned questions….. send an ambulance!

    If they are already doing call triage, then this proposal is redundant and idiotic.

    19 minutes? You can get a cab or pizza faster. What about a trauma incident? Going to send a police officer out to check on the internal bleeder to see if they really need to go to the hospital?

    Oh, never mind. Saves money. Increases effeciency.

    Drives up pain and suffering, but, a small price to pay. Especially when you are not the one in pain or suffering.