<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week&#8217;s Guest Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firegeezer.com/2007/06/28/this-weeks-guest-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firegeezer.com/2007/06/28/this-weeks-guest-commentary/</link>
	<description>Hottest Fire Blog On The Web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Salata</title>
		<link>http://www.firegeezer.com/2007/06/28/this-weeks-guest-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Salata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s214263297.onlinehome.us/archives/473#comment-78</guid>
		<description>The story about the Gainesville townhouse talks about the fire walls between the townhouses. Well since one of those townhouses was mine and I was one of the first persons to discover the fire I can say that the fire walls did little good because the fire started on the outside of the building. The fire walls were still intact except at the roof area when I went thru with the insurnce company. You are right the the siding added to the speed as within 10 minutes the backs of three townhouses were fully engulfed. If the fire had started inside it may not have caused as much damage or slowed enough to control it. The second issue was access to the back area of the townhouses. There is no way to get vehicles to the back area of the townhouses so fire fighters were forced to go thru the front of the townhouses and only single cherry picker type truck (sorry I don't know what fire fighter call that type truck)was hosing down the roof area. When I begin to have the place rebuilt I plan on see what I can to make it more resistant but there are limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story about the Gainesville townhouse talks about the fire walls between the townhouses. Well since one of those townhouses was mine and I was one of the first persons to discover the fire I can say that the fire walls did little good because the fire started on the outside of the building. The fire walls were still intact except at the roof area when I went thru with the insurnce company. You are right the the siding added to the speed as within 10 minutes the backs of three townhouses were fully engulfed. If the fire had started inside it may not have caused as much damage or slowed enough to control it. The second issue was access to the back area of the townhouses. There is no way to get vehicles to the back area of the townhouses so fire fighters were forced to go thru the front of the townhouses and only single cherry picker type truck (sorry I don&#8217;t know what fire fighter call that type truck)was hosing down the roof area. When I begin to have the place rebuilt I plan on see what I can to make it more resistant but there are limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firegeezer &#187; Morning Lineup - July 23</title>
		<link>http://www.firegeezer.com/2007/06/28/this-weeks-guest-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Firegeezer &#187; Morning Lineup - July 23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s214263297.onlinehome.us/archives/473#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] methods that lead to rapid fire spread.  Our own columnist LightRock covered this last month (HERE) and since then we have seen a lot of stories about these rapidly-spreading house fires.  More and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] methods that lead to rapid fire spread.  Our own columnist LightRock covered this last month (HERE) and since then we have seen a lot of stories about these rapidly-spreading house fires.  More and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hendelman</title>
		<link>http://www.firegeezer.com/2007/06/28/this-weeks-guest-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s214263297.onlinehome.us/archives/473#comment-76</guid>
		<description>"Lightrock" is correct in his observations. Having started out on the tailstep in this business back in 1976 and seen one or two of these spectacular townhouse fires....the math is simple. 

Non-combustible buildings materials used as fire seperation assemblies slow down fire spread, minimize exposure damage and or stop the spread of fire into adjacent occupancies as designed. But alas, that was an expensive way to build our homes....now with the compromise (my opinion only of course) between building codes and the building industry; it is far cheaper to use combustible very light weight building materials which in some cases will ignite with such propensity as to increase fire spread (like vinyl siding) with such speed that even the compressed response time of emergency services leaves us scrambling to get the incident under control before it consumes not only the orignial occupany but adjacent occupancies as well. 

Ok, burn down a couple of them, pay the insurance and rebuild.....well that sure does not sit well with me....why is it in the construction industry we accept that the old way of doing business was antiquated and the next new wiz kid has a better solution to build them faster, less expensive but yet "just as safe".

I think it is time we go back to the basics in building construction with more non-combustible materials in the appropriate locations. Otherwise, this type of fire and the resulting destruction will continue to plague the fire service....even when proper size-up and the appropriate action plan has been executed. 

Great commentary Jim.....

Joel Hendelman, 
City of Fairfax Fire Department</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lightrock&#8221; is correct in his observations. Having started out on the tailstep in this business back in 1976 and seen one or two of these spectacular townhouse fires&#8230;.the math is simple. </p>
<p>Non-combustible buildings materials used as fire seperation assemblies slow down fire spread, minimize exposure damage and or stop the spread of fire into adjacent occupancies as designed. But alas, that was an expensive way to build our homes&#8230;.now with the compromise (my opinion only of course) between building codes and the building industry; it is far cheaper to use combustible very light weight building materials which in some cases will ignite with such propensity as to increase fire spread (like vinyl siding) with such speed that even the compressed response time of emergency services leaves us scrambling to get the incident under control before it consumes not only the orignial occupany but adjacent occupancies as well. </p>
<p>Ok, burn down a couple of them, pay the insurance and rebuild&#8230;..well that sure does not sit well with me&#8230;.why is it in the construction industry we accept that the old way of doing business was antiquated and the next new wiz kid has a better solution to build them faster, less expensive but yet &#8220;just as safe&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think it is time we go back to the basics in building construction with more non-combustible materials in the appropriate locations. Otherwise, this type of fire and the resulting destruction will continue to plague the fire service&#8230;.even when proper size-up and the appropriate action plan has been executed. </p>
<p>Great commentary Jim&#8230;..</p>
<p>Joel Hendelman,<br />
City of Fairfax Fire Department</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
